Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Economos v. Liljedahl Bros.

Economos v. Liljedahl Bros.

870 A.2d 1082, 273 Conn. 913, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 100
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 11, 2005
DocketSC 17394
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 870 A.2d 1082 (Economos v. Liljedahl Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Economos v. Liljedahl Bros., 870 A.2d 1082, 273 Conn. 913, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 100 (Colo. 2005).

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 578 (AC 24877), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly vacated the arbitration award because the arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law?”

[914]*914The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17394. Karen L. Dowd, Wesley W. Horton and Anita M. Varanes, in support of the petition. James H. Lee and David R. Clemens, in opposition. Decided March 11, 2005

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Economos v. Liljedahl Bros., Inc.
901 A.2d 1198 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
870 A.2d 1082, 273 Conn. 913, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/economos-v-liljedahl-bros-conn-2005.