Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Eckhart v. State

Eckhart v. State

670 So. 2d 977, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 159
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 8, 1996·No. 95-1381·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

670 So.2d 977 (1996)

Daniel ECKHART, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-1381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 8, 1996.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After careful review of the record in this Anders appeal from a plea of nolo contendere, having found nothing that would arguably constitute reversible error, we affirm the conviction and sentence for violation of probation. We remand, however, to the trial court for entry of a written order of violation of probation, because none appears in the record. See Wood v. State, 653 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Wiggers v. State, 652 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Benton v. State, 652 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

BOOTH, JOANOS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eckhart v. State, 670 So. 2d 977, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

670 So. 2d 977 (Eckhart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reatz v. State
677 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cromartie v. State
671 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Murray
670 So. 2d 977 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)