Eckhart v. State
This text of 670 So. 2d 977 (Eckhart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Daniel ECKHART, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
After careful review of the record in this Anders appeal from a plea of nolo contendere, having found nothing that would arguably constitute reversible error, we affirm the conviction and sentence for violation of probation. We remand, however, to the trial court for entry of a written order of violation of probation, because none appears in the record. See Wood v. State, 653 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Wiggers v. State, 652 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Benton v. State, 652 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
BOOTH, JOANOS and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 So. 2d 977, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eckhart-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.