Cromartie v. State

671 So. 2d 210, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3267, 1996 WL 135091
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2644
StatusPublished

This text of 671 So. 2d 210 (Cromartie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cromartie v. State, 671 So. 2d 210, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3267, 1996 WL 135091 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After careful review of the record in this Anders appeal from a plea of nolo contende-re, we affirm the conviction and sentence. We remand the case to the trial court, however, for entry of a written order of probation revocation, because none appears in the record. See Eckhart v. State, 670 So.2d 977, (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Wiggers v. State, 652 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

ERVIN, MINER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wiggers v. State
652 So. 2d 1294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Eckhart v. State
670 So. 2d 977 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 So. 2d 210, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3267, 1996 WL 135091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cromartie-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.