Eckhardt v. Materne

52 So. 172, 126 La. 1, 1910 La. LEXIS 597
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 28, 1910·No. No. 17,759·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PROVOSTY, J.

This is a suit in nullity of judgment. Pleas of res judicata and es-toppel were interposed. Prom an entry on the minutes informing us that these pleas were sustained, and from the fact that plaintiff. appeals, we infer that plaintiff’s suit was dismissed; but there is no judgment in the transcript. In the absence of a judgment from the transcript, this court is bound to dismiss the appeal ex proprio motu. Carondelet Canal Co. v. City of New Orleans, 44 La. Ann. 394, 10 South. 871.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eckhardt v. Materne, 52 So. 172, 126 La. 1, 1910 La. LEXIS 597 (La. 1910).

52 So. 172 (Eckhardt v. Materne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adler & Co. v. Moses
5 La. App. 601 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)