Adler & Co. v. Moses

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Adler & Co. v. Moses

5 La. App. 601, 1927 La. App. LEXIS 85

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 12, 1927

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 5 La. App. 601 (Adler & Co. v. Moses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adler & Co. v. Moses, 5 La. App. 601, 1927 La. App. LEXIS 85 (La. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

LECHE, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment maintaining an exception of no cause of action as against three of the defendants.

The minutes show that such a judgment was rendered, but they do not show that it was read and signed in open court, nor do we find any written and signed judgment in the record. Every final judgment must be written, read and signed in open court. C. P. 543-546.

The appeal was taken before the judgment became final and is therefore premature. Eckhardt vs. Materne, 128 La. 1, 52 South. 172; Hanchey vs. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 135 La. 352, 65 So. 487; Mitchell vs. Shreveport Creosoting Co., 123 La. 958, 49 South. 655; Hauch vs. Drew Inv. Co., 116 La. 488, 40 South. 847; State vs. Hodge, Dist. Atty. vs. Oliver, Sheriff, 132 La. 180; Franke vs. Shaw, 154 La. 509, 97 South. 793.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI