Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. ESPN, Inc.

995 N.E.2d 179, 21 N.Y.3d 1032, 972 N.Y.S.2d 216, 2013 NY Slip Op 83371, 2013 WL 4516377, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 1898
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 27, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 995 N.E.2d 179 (Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. ESPN, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. ESPN, Inc., 995 N.E.2d 179, 21 N.Y.3d 1032, 972 N.Y.S.2d 216, 2013 NY Slip Op 83371, 2013 WL 4516377, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 1898 (N.Y. 2013).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. The order affirming the denial of the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and affirming the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict resolves the issues raised on those motions; it does not dispose of all of the issues in the action (see CPLR 5611). The final and appealable paper to the Court of Appeals is the final judgment entered after the denial of the motions, or an Appellate Division order resolving an appeal from that judgment (see Anderson v Young & Rubicam, 14 NY3d 909 [2010]; Butler v New York City Tr. Auth., 14 NY3d 909 [2010]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butler v. New York City Transit Authority
930 N.E.2d 761 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
Anderson v. Young & Rubicam
930 N.E.2d 761 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
995 N.E.2d 179, 21 N.Y.3d 1032, 972 N.Y.S.2d 216, 2013 NY Slip Op 83371, 2013 WL 4516377, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 1898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echostar-satellite-llc-v-espn-inc-ny-2013.