Butler v. New York City Transit Authority

930 N.E.2d 761, 14 N.Y.3d 909, 2010 NY Slip Op 73545, 904 N.Y.S.2d 688, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 1218
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 2010·No. Motion No: 2010-305·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. The order denying the CPLR 4404 motion to set aside the verdict resolves the issues raised on the CPLR 4404 motion; it does not dispose of all of the issues in the action (see CPLR 5611). The final and *910 appealable paper to the Court of Appeals is the final judgment entered after the denial of the motion or an Appellate Division order resolving an appeal from that judgment (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. New York City Transit Authority, 930 N.E.2d 761, 14 N.Y.3d 909, 2010 NY Slip Op 73545, 904 N.Y.S.2d 688, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 1218 (N.Y. 2010).

930 N.E.2d 761 (Butler v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lariviere v. New York City Transit Authority
53 N.E.3d 740 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. ESPN, Inc.
995 N.E.2d 179 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)