Echevarria v. State

15 So. 3d 812, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9984, 2009 WL 2168838
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 2009
Docket3D08-1413
StatusPublished

This text of 15 So. 3d 812 (Echevarria v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Echevarria v. State, 15 So. 3d 812, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9984, 2009 WL 2168838 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Knight v. State, 919 So.2d 628, 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“A trial court’s determination that a peremptory strike is genuine, rather than pretextual, ‘will be affirmed on appeal unless clearly erroneous.’ ” (quoting Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759, 764-65 (Fla.1996))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melbourne v. State
679 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Knight v. State
919 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 So. 3d 812, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9984, 2009 WL 2168838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echevarria-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.