Echevarria v. State
15 So. 3d 812, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9984, 2009 WL 2168838
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Echevarria v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 976 So. 2d 84 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Knight v. State, 919 So.2d 628, 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“A trial court’s determination that a peremptory strike is genuine, rather than pretextual, ‘will be affirmed on appeal unless clearly erroneous.’ ” (quoting Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759, 764-65 (Fla.1996))).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Echevarria v. State, 15 So. 3d 812, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9984, 2009 WL 2168838 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
15 So. 3d 812 (Echevarria v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Melbourne v. State
679 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Knight v. State
919 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)