Ebeling & Reuss Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 376
United States Customs Court·Decided September 27, 1956·No. No. 60263; protests 146559-K, etc. (Philadelphia)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

On the call of the nine cases enumerated in the schedule of protests, attached to and made part of our decision herein, counsel for plaintiff moved their consolidation for the purposes of trial and, there being no objection by opposing counsel, the court so ordered.

Due to the variety of articles, the classification of which is here in question, it is deemed advisable at the outset to list the merchandise according to item and the corresponding invoice item numbers:

[377]*377It is considered to be of further assistance to enumerate the various consumption entry numbers and commercial invoices which cover the controverted merchandise:

Upon importation of the various shipments, all items of forks, whether less or more than 4 inches in length, exclusive of handle, were classified by the collector of customs within the following provision of paragraph 355 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 355), as modified by the British Trade Agreement, 74 Treas. Dec. 253, T. D. 49753, or by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, and subjected to duty at the rate of 16 cents each and 35 per centum ad valorem:

[378]*378 5feXsVV0aFlCjTorq7I8SAEXT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ebeling & Reuss Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 376 (cusc 1956).

37 Cust. Ct. 376 (Ebeling & Reuss Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quality Marble & Granite Co. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 174 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)