E.B. v. D.G.

71 So. 3d 225, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15743
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 5, 2011·No. No. 4D11-784·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See J.G. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 22 So.3d 774, 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (“[T]he parents’ claim that their procedural due process rights were violated under the Rules of Juvenile Procedure was raised for the first time in this appeal, and therefore was not preserved for appellate review.”).

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E.B. v. D.G., 71 So. 3d 225, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15743 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

71 So. 3d 225 (E.B. v. D.G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eb v. Dg
71 So. 3d 225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)