Eavey Co. v. Department of Treasury of Indiana
310 U.S. 611, 60 S. Ct. 1081
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Hendrick v. Maryland, 235 U. S. 610; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 173; Carley & Hamilton v. Snook, 281 U. S. 66, 72-73; Arthur v. Indiana, 309 U. S. 630.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eavey Co. v. Department of Treasury of Indiana, 310 U.S. 611, 60 S. Ct. 1081 (1940).
310 U.S. 611 (Eavey Co. v. Department of Treasury of Indiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hendrick v. Maryland
235 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Carley & Hamilton, Inc. v. Snook Chief of the Division of Motor Vehicles
281 U.S. 66 (Supreme Court, 1930)
Hicklin v. Coney
290 U.S. 169 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Arthur v. Indiana
309 U.S. 630 (Supreme Court, 1940)