Arthur v. Indiana

309 U.S. 630, 60 S. Ct. 617
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 11, 1940·No. No. 742·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Hendrick v. Maryland, 235 U. S. 610; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 173; Carley & Hamilton v. Snook, 281 U. S. 66, 72-73.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arthur v. Indiana, 309 U.S. 630, 60 S. Ct. 617 (1940).

309 U.S. 630 (Arthur v. Indiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eavey Co. v. Department of Treasury of Indiana
310 U.S. 611 (Supreme Court, 1940)