Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1

Arizona Supreme Court

Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1

595 P.2d 169, 122 Ariz. 377, 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 286

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedMay 9, 1979

DocketNo. 14217-PR

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 595 P.2d 169 (Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1, 595 P.2d 169, 122 Ariz. 377, 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 286 (Ark. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

HAYS, Justice.

The petition for review is granted. The decision of the Court of Appeals in Eaton v. [378]*378Unified School District No. 1 of Pima County, Arizona et al., 122 Ariz. 391, 595 P.2d 183 (App.1979), is approved and adopted as the opinion of this court. We note that Division Two of the Court of Appeals has overruled Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Pleasants, 23 Ariz.App. 467, 534 P.2d 275 (1975), the case which was in conflict with Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1, supra, and originally occasioned our granting of the petition for review. See Hanania v. City of Tucson, 123 Ariz. -, 597 P.2d 190 (App.1979).

CAMERON, C. J., STRUCKMEYER, V. C. J., and HOLOHAN, J., concur.

Note: Justice FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., did not participate in the determination of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAYS, Justice.

The petition for review is granted. The decision of the Court of Appeals in Eaton v. [378]*378Unified School District No. 1 of Pima County, Arizona et al., 122 Ariz. 391, 595 P.2d 183 (App.1979), is approved and adopted as the opinion of this court. We note that Division Two of the Court of Appeals has overruled Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Pleasants, 23 Ariz.App. 467, 534 P.2d 275 (1975), the case which was in conflict with Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1, supra, and originally occasioned our granting of the petition for review. See Hanania v. City of Tucson, 123 Ariz. -, 597 P.2d 190 (App.1979).

CAMERON, C. J., STRUCKMEYER, V. C. J., and HOLOHAN, J., concur.

Note: Justice FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., did not participate in the determination of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

595 P.2d 169, 122 Ariz. 377, 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaton-v-unified-school-district-no-1-ariz-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack