Eaton v. R. B. George Investments, Inc.

254 S.W.2d 189, 1951 Tex. App. LEXIS 1908
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 28, 1951
DocketNo. 14551
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 254 S.W.2d 189 (Eaton v. R. B. George Investments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eaton v. R. B. George Investments, Inc., 254 S.W.2d 189, 1951 Tex. App. LEXIS 1908 (Tex. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

CRAMER, Justice.

Mrs. Eaton, joined pro forma by her husband F. W. Eaton, filed this suit in the trial court against R. B. George Investments, Inc., to recover damages growing out of the death of Ginger Dale Ensley, the [190]*190three-ycar-eight-months-old daughter of Mrs. Eaton, who was found dead in a dipping vat on the R. B. George Investments, Inc. farm in Dallas.

The parties will be designated as in the trial court. The plaintiffs’ pleadings alleged that the vat and its surrounding fences, etc., were attractive to children, and then followed in separate paragraphs four specific acts of negligence alleged to have been the proximate cause of the child’s death, and prayed for damages of $15,072.-50, costs, interest, etc.

The following plat and picture (among others) of the premises involved were introduced in evidence, to wit:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muniz v. Kravis
757 A.2d 1207 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)
Eaton v. R. B. George Investment, Inc.
260 S.W.2d 587 (Texas Supreme Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 S.W.2d 189, 1951 Tex. App. LEXIS 1908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaton-v-r-b-george-investments-inc-texapp-1951.