Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/Eaton v. R. B. George Investments, Inc.

Eaton v. R. B. George Investments, Inc.

254 S.W.2d 189, 1951 Tex. App. LEXIS 1908
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 28, 1951·No. No. 14551·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

CRAMER, Justice.

Mrs. Eaton, joined pro forma by her husband F. W. Eaton, filed this suit in the trial court against R. B. George Investments, Inc., to recover damages growing out of the death of Ginger Dale Ensley, the [190]*190three-ycar-eight-months-old daughter of Mrs. Eaton, who was found dead in a dipping vat on the R. B. George Investments, Inc. farm in Dallas.

The parties will be designated as in the trial court. The plaintiffs’ pleadings alleged that the vat and its surrounding fences, etc., were attractive to children, and then followed in separate paragraphs four specific acts of negligence alleged to have been the proximate cause of the child’s death, and prayed for damages of $15,072.-50, costs, interest, etc.

The following plat and picture (among others) of the premises involved were introduced in evidence, to wit:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eaton v. R. B. George Investments, Inc., 254 S.W.2d 189, 1951 Tex. App. LEXIS 1908 (Tex. Ct. App. 1951).

254 S.W.2d 189 (Eaton v. R. B. George Investments, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muniz v. Kravis
757 A.2d 1207 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)
Arturo R. Moreno, Personal Representative of Oswaldo Moreno, Deceased v. Stahmann Farms, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation
693 F.2d 106 (Tenth Circuit, 1982)
Eaton v. R. B. George Investment, Inc.
260 S.W.2d 587 (Texas Supreme Court, 1953)