Eaton v. Hungerford

79 A.D.3d 1629, 913 N.Y.S.2d 619
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 2010
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.D.3d 1629 (Eaton v. Hungerford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eaton v. Hungerford, 79 A.D.3d 1629, 913 N.Y.S.2d 619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Harold L. Galloway, J.), entered May 1, 2009. The order, among other things, denied in part the motion of plaintiffs for leave to renew or reargue and for leave to amend their complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Eaton v Hungerford (79 AD3d 1627 [2010]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Carni, Lindley and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eaton v. Hungerford
79 A.D.3d 1627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 A.D.3d 1629, 913 N.Y.S.2d 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaton-v-hungerford-nyappdiv-2010.