Eaton-Freeman v. Hughes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eaton-Freeman v. Hughes

149 A.D.2d 970, 543 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6007

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 1989·Published

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed petitioner’s application seeking a writ of prohibition. In our view, respondent was acting within his lawful authority in ordering disclosure of the jointly filed tax returns of peti[971] tioner and her husband, who is a party to the Family Court support proceeding (see, Family Ct Act § 439 [c]; Benson v Benson, 108 Misc 2d 892, 894). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, O’Donnell, J. — art 78.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed petitioner’s application seeking a writ of prohibition. In our view, respondent was acting within his lawful authority in ordering disclosure of the jointly filed tax returns of peti[971] tioner and her husband, who is a party to the Family Court support proceeding (see, Family Ct Act § 439 [c]; Benson v Benson, 108 Misc 2d 892, 894). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, O’Donnell, J. — art 78.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Davis, JJ.

Eaton-Freeman v. Hughes, 149 A.D.2d 970, 543 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

149 A.D.2d 970 (Eaton-Freeman v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related