Eastman Kodak Company v. Fotomat Corporation
441 F.2d 1079
Opinions
It is ordered that appellee’s motion to dismiss as untimely Fotomat’s appeal from the preliminary injunction granted below, D.C., 317 F.Supp. 304, filed in the above styled and numbered cause, is hereby granted. We deem the attempted appeal to be time-barred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eastman Kodak Company v. Fotomat Corporation, 441 F.2d 1079 (5th Cir. 1971).
441 F.2d 1079 (Eastman Kodak Company v. Fotomat Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Photaz Imports Ltd., Inc.
853 F. Supp. 667 (W.D. New York, 1993)
West v. West
825 F. Supp. 1033 (N.D. Georgia, 1992)
Union Carbide Corp. v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
619 F. Supp. 1028 (D. Oregon, 1985)
Durbin Brass Works, Inc. v. Schuler
532 F. Supp. 41 (E.D. Missouri, 1982)
Corpus Christi Bank & Trust v. Cross
586 S.W.2d 664 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Laverne International, Ltd. v. American Institute of Interior Designers, Inc.
353 F. Supp. 659 (S.D. New York, 1973)
Eastman Kodak Company v. Fotomat Corporation
441 F.2d 1079 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)