East & West Coast Service Corp. v. Papahagis

17 A.2d 873, 340 Pa. 575, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 371
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 21, 1941·No. Appeal, 93·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order of the court below discharging defendant’s rule to show cause why disputed issues of fact arising in a suit in equity should not be tried by a jury. Such an order is interlocutory only. Cf. Stewart v. Stewart, 65 Pa. Superior Ct. 593. Defendant also assigns error to the dismissal of his preliminary objections to plaintiff’s amended bill and to the sustaining of plaintiff’s preliminary objections to defendant’s answer containing new matter. These orders, also, are interlocutory: Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company v. Johnston & Harder, Inc., 330 Pa. 336. The rule is settled beyond doubt that preliminary orders are not appealable in advance of final disposition of the case except when made so by statute: Lewis v. Beatty, 306 Pa. 242. Neither legislative enactment nor the Rules of Equity Practice of this Court authorize an appeal in this situation.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

East & West Coast Service Corp. v. Papahagis, 17 A.2d 873, 340 Pa. 575, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 371 (Pa. 1941).

17 A.2d 873 (East & West Coast Service Corp. v. Papahagis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amaral v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank
657 A.2d 1069 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1995)
Miller Estate v. Department of Highways
227 A.2d 679 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Stadler v. Mt. Oliver Borough
95 A.2d 776 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
York Telephone & Telegraph Co. Employes Case
55 Pa. D. & C. 113 (York County Court of Common Pleas, 1945)
Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Yellow Cab & Bus Co.
53 Pa. D. & C. 600 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1945)