East River Savings Bank v. Samuels

259 A.D. 870, 20 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7046

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. ; Dore, J., dissents and votes to -reverse judgment in so far as it holds appellants individually liable for a deficiency judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

East River Savings Bank v. Samuels, 259 A.D. 870, 20 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 870 (East River Savings Bank v. Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.