East River Savings Bank v. Samuels
259 A.D. 870, 20 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7046
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. ; Dore, J., dissents and votes to -reverse judgment in so far as it holds appellants individually liable for a deficiency judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
East River Savings Bank v. Samuels, 259 A.D. 870, 20 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
259 A.D. 870 (East River Savings Bank v. Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.