East River Savings Bank v. Samuels
259 A.D. 870, 20 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7046
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 17, 1940
StatusPublished
This text of 259 A.D. 870 (East River Savings Bank v. Samuels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
East River Savings Bank v. Samuels, 259 A.D. 870, 20 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. ; Dore, J., dissents and votes to -reverse judgment in so far as it holds appellants individually liable for a deficiency judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 870, 20 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-river-savings-bank-v-samuels-nyappdiv-1940.