East River Savings Bank v. Samuels

257 A.D. 940, 13 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8543

This text of 257 A.D. 940 (East River Savings Bank v. Samuels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
East River Savings Bank v. Samuels, 257 A.D. 940, 13 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants-appellants to answer within twenty days after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — O’Malley, Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to dismiss as to so much of the cause of action set forth in the complaint as attempts to establish against the appellants individually liability for a deficiency judgment. [170 Misc. 779.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

East River Savings Bank v. 245 Broadway Corp.
170 Misc. 779 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D. 940, 13 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-river-savings-bank-v-samuels-nyappdiv-1939.