East River Savings Bank v. Samuels

257 A.D. 940, 13 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8543

Opinion

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants-appellants to answer within twenty days after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — O’Malley, Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to dismiss as to so much of the cause of action set forth in the complaint as attempts to establish against the appellants individually liability for a deficiency judgment. [170 Misc. 779.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

East River Savings Bank v. Samuels, 257 A.D. 940, 13 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

257 A.D. 940 (East River Savings Bank v. Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

East River Savings Bank v. 245 Broadway Corp.
170 Misc. 779 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)