East Ramapo Central School District v. New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

East Ramapo Central School District v. New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal

2017 NY Slip Op 3486, 150 A.D.3d 682, 51 N.Y.S.3d 427

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 2017

Docket2014-05174

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 3486 (East Ramapo Central School District v. New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

East Ramapo Central School District v. New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal, 2017 NY Slip Op 3486, 150 A.D.3d 682, 51 N.Y.S.3d 427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Stephen A. Bucaria, J.), entered March 28, 2014, June 18, 2014, and September 2, 2014, respectively.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from the intermediate orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeals from the orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the companion appeal and cross appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; East Ramapo Cent. Sch. Dist. v New York Schs. Ins. Reciprocal, 150 AD3d 683 [2d Dept 2017] [decided herewith]).

Leventhal, J.P., Maltese, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Stephen A. Bucaria, J.), entered March 28, 2014, June 18, 2014, and September 2, 2014, respectively.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from the intermediate orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeals from the orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the companion appeal and cross appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; East Ramapo Cent. Sch. Dist. v New York Schs. Ins. Reciprocal, 150 AD3d 683 [2d Dept 2017] [decided herewith]).

Leventhal, J.P., Maltese, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 3486, 150 A.D.3d 682, 51 N.Y.S.3d 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-ramapo-central-school-district-v-new-york-schools-insurance-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack