Earp v. Tyler

73 Mo. 617
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedApril 15, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 73 Mo. 617 (Earp v. Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earp v. Tyler, 73 Mo. 617 (Mo. 1881).

Opinion

Hough, J.

It is the settled law of this State that when one person contracts to labor for another for a specified^ term and leaves the service of his employer before the expiration of such term without any cause proceeding from the employer, or the “ act of God,” he cannot maintain an action for the value of the services he has rendered. Posey v. Garth, 7 Mo. 94; Caldwell v. Dickson, 17 Mo. 575; Schnerr v. Lemp, 19 Mo. 40; Henson v. Hampton, 32 Mo. 408 2 Parsons on Contracts, 36, and note g. Eor the rule in the case of building contracts, vide Haysler v. Owen, 61 Mo. 270. As the circuit court, in the trial of this case, disregarded the rule of law applicable to contracts for personal service, its judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walden v. American Bankers' Assurance Co.
166 S.W. 1111 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1914)
Dempsey v. Dorrance
132 S.W. 33 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Lindner v. Cape Brewery & Ice Co.
111 S.W. 600 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Clough v. Stillwell Meat Co.
86 S.W. 580 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Paul v. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co.
87 Mo. App. 647 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
Lathrop v. Mayer
86 Mo. App. 355 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1900)
Keith v. Ridge
47 S.W. 904 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
Blanton v. King
73 Mo. App. 148 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)
Banse v. Tate
62 Mo. App. 150 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)
Moore v. H. Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co.
20 S.W. 975 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Priest v. Consolidated Tank Line Co.
51 Mo. App. 205 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Harkness & Russell v. Briscoe
47 Mo. App. 196 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)
Leveridge v. Lipscomb
36 Mo. App. 630 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1889)
Fletcher v. Milburn Manufacturing Co.
35 Mo. App. 321 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
Gruetzner v. Aude Furniture Co.
28 Mo. App. 263 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Edwards v. Meyers
22 Mo. App. 481 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
Hanel v. Freund
17 Mo. App. 618 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Mo. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earp-v-tyler-mo-1881.