Earp v. Tyler
This text of 73 Mo. 617 (Earp v. Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is the settled law of this State that when one person contracts to labor for another for a specified^ term and leaves the service of his employer before the expiration of such term without any cause proceeding from the employer, or the “ act of God,” he cannot maintain an action for the value of the services he has rendered. Posey v. Garth, 7 Mo. 94; Caldwell v. Dickson, 17 Mo. 575; Schnerr v. Lemp, 19 Mo. 40; Henson v. Hampton, 32 Mo. 408 2 Parsons on Contracts, 36, and note g. Eor the rule in the case of building contracts, vide Haysler v. Owen, 61 Mo. 270. As the circuit court, in the trial of this case, disregarded the rule of law applicable to contracts for personal service, its judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Mo. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earp-v-tyler-mo-1881.