Earl Wayne Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corporation, Penrod Drilling Corporation and Hytorc, M.E.

Fifth Circuit

Earl Wayne Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corporation, Penrod Drilling Corporation and Hytorc, M.E.

20 F.3d 614, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9221, 1994 WL 157065

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 1994

Docket92-7378

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 20 F.3d 614 (Earl Wayne Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corporation, Penrod Drilling Corporation and Hytorc, M.E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Earl Wayne Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corporation, Penrod Drilling Corporation and Hytorc, M.E., 20 F.3d 614, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9221, 1994 WL 157065 (5th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ON SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI