Earl v. Gould

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6782

VINCENT BRADFORD EARL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT GOULD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:03-cv-00109)

Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 28, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Bradford Earl, Appellant Pro Se. Julie M. Kepple, BUNCOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Vincent Bradford Earl appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his claims filed pursuant to the Religious Land

Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc -

2000cc-5 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Earl v. Gould, No. 1:03-cv-00109 (W.D.N.C.

Apr. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -