Earl v. Gould

Fourth Circuit

Earl v. Gould

192 F. App'x 226

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2006·No. No. 06-6782·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Bradford Earl appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his claims filed pursuant to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc — 2000ec-5 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Earl v. Gould, No. l:03-cv-00109 [227]*227(W.D.N.C. Apr. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Bradford Earl appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his claims filed pursuant to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc — 2000ec-5 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Earl v. Gould, No. l:03-cv-00109 [227]*227(W.D.N.C. Apr. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Earl v. Gould, 192 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

192 F. App'x 226 (Earl v. Gould) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related