Earl Lonnie Thomas v. United States
This text of 268 F.2d 581 (Earl Lonnie Thomas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Thomas was convicted of breaking open a locked automobile and stealing certain property therefrom. Proof for the Government showed his fingerprint was on the door handle of the car. On appeal he says the print on the handle was not sufficiently shown to be his, and that the prints of his fingers with which it was compared were illegally taken from him. But no motion was made for the suppression of the prints, no objection was taken to their admission, and no foundation was laid for such motion or objection.
We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 F.2d 581, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 5, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-lonnie-thomas-v-united-states-cadc-1959.