Earl Lonnie Thomas v. United States
Opinions
Thomas was convicted of breaking open a locked automobile and stealing certain property therefrom. Proof for the Government showed his fingerprint was on the door handle of the car. On appeal he says the print on the handle was not sufficiently shown to be his, and that the prints of his fingers with which it was compared were illegally taken from him. But no motion was made for the suppression of the prints, no objection was taken to their admission, and no foundation was laid for such motion or objection.
We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
268 F.2d 581 (Earl Lonnie Thomas v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.