Eads Operating Co. v. Thompson

498 So. 2d 1088, 1986 La. LEXIS 7863

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Eads Operating Co. v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1986 La. LEXIS 7864 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 19, 1986·No. No. 86-CC-2278·Published

Opinion

In re Eads Operating Co. Inc.; Murchison Oil & Gas Inc.; Anderson, William; Bufler & Bufler Constr. Co.; Bufler, Claude; Bufler, Glenn; Davis Crude Inc.; Eads, John; Eads, Ralph; Eads, Ralph III; Garrity, James; Key, Martin L.; Mineral Projects Inc.; Ollinger, Harry; Pollution Control Systems Inc.; Peeples, Eugene M. IV; Peterson, Retha; Roland, George Dr.; Stroud, Richard; Western State Bank; Yager, Sam; Olafson, Jim; applying for writs of certiorari and/or supervisory writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW-86-1009; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 291647.

Granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is vacated. The judgment of the trial court overruling the exceptions of no cause of action and prescription is reinstated. The case is remanded to the district court for trial on the merits.

WATSON, J., dissents from the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WATSON, J., dissents from the order.

Eads Operating Co. v. Thompson, 498 So. 2d 1088, 1986 La. LEXIS 7863 (La. 1986).

Pincite

498 So. 2d 1088 (Eads Operating Co. v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.