Eads Operating Co. v. Thompson
This text of 498 So. 2d 746 (Eads Operating Co. v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Eads Operating Co. Inc.; Murchison Oil & Gas Inc.; Anderson, William; Bufler & Bufler Constr. Co.; Bufler, Claude; Bufler, Glenn; Davis Crude Inc.; Eads, John; Eads, Ralph; Eads, Ralph III; Garrity, James; Key, Martin L.; Mineral Projects Inc.; Ollinger, Harry; Pollution Control Systems Inc.; Peeples, Eugene M. IY; Peterson, Retha; Roland, George Dr.; Stroud, Richard; Western State Bank; Yager, Sam; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW/86/1057; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 291647.
Granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is vacated. The judgment of the trial court overruling the exceptions of no cause of action and prescription is reinstated. The case is remanded to the district court for trial on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
498 So. 2d 746, 1986 La. LEXIS 7864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eads-operating-co-v-thompson-la-1986.