E. Leitz, Inc. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 501
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in E. Leitz, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 358
United States Customs Court·Decided June 8, 1960·No. No. 64277; protest 59/33727 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E. Leitz, Inc. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 501 (cusc 1960).

44 Cust. Ct. 501 (E. Leitz, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manca, Inc. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 271 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)