E. Leitz, Inc. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 457
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in E. Leitz, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Cust. Ct. 391 →
United States Customs Court·Decided February 26, 1958·No. No. 61582; protests 276649-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
[458]*458Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, parts for enlargers are properly dutiable as parts of photographic cameras under paragraph 1551, the claim of the plaintiffs at 20 percent was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E. Leitz, Inc. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 457 (cusc 1958).
40 Cust. Ct. 457 (E. Leitz, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manca, Inc. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 271 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)