E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Strategic Materials, Inc.
Opinion
wOoe 4:48 UV VEER SS MMU eo Pa eerie PAY tt 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 E. & J. GALLO WINERY, et al., No. 1:17-cv-01709-EPG 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH 14 STRATEGIC MATERIALS, INC., (ECF No. 134) 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs E&J Gallo Winery and Gallo Glass Company and Defendant Strategic " Materials, Inc. have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 134). 8 In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
22 IT IS SOORDERED. 23 . Dated: _Suly 22, 2020 [sf ey □□ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Strategic Materials, Inc. (E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Strategic Materials, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.