E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Strategic Materials, Inc.
Opinion
wOoe 4:48 UV VEER SS MMU eo Pa eerie PAY tt 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 E. & J. GALLO WINERY, et al., No. 1:17-cv-01709-EPG 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH 13 V. PREJUDICE 14 STRATEGIC MATERIALS, INC., (ECF No. 134) 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs E&J Gallo Winery and Gallo Glass Company and Defendant Strategic " Materials, Inc. have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 134). 8 In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
22 | IT IS SOORDERED. 23 . | Dated: _Suly 22, 2020 [sf ey □□ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Strategic Materials, Inc. (E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Strategic Materials, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.