E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Strategic Materials, Inc.

Opinion

wOow 4:48 UV VEER NS MMIC AO OI ee AY tN 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 E. & J. GALLO WINERY, et al. CASE NO. 1:17-cv-01709-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING ALL DEADLINES OTHER THAN WITH RESPECT TO D SEALING REQUESTS 13 15 Defendant. 16 On June 1, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice. (ECF No. 134). 17 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the action has now ended. The Court VACATES 18 all deadlines and hearings other than those with respect to sealing requests as discussed in the 19 Court’s June 4, 2020 order, (ECF No. 135). See Gamble v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 20 139-140 (2d Cir. 2004) (holding that while generally, a “filing in the district court of a stipulation 21 of dismissal signed by all parties pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) divests the court of all jurisdiction 22 over a case,” a district court maintains “jurisdiction either to dispose of material in its files as it 23 thinks appropriate or to modify or vacate its own protective orders with respect to such 24 documents”). 95 ITIS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: _ June 5, 2020 [sf Sy □ 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28