E. C. Schneider, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
This text of 389 Pa. 593 (E. C. Schneider, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
This appeal involves the expansion of a nonconforming use. The principles governing the increase or extension or expansion of a nonconforming use are well settled. See Firth v. Scherzberg, 366 Pa. 443, 77 A. 2d 443; Humphreys v. Stuart Realty Corp., 364 Pa. 616, 73 A. 2d 407; Peirce Appeal, 384 Pa. 100, 119 A. 2d 506; Blanarik Appeal, 375 Pa. 209, 100 A. 2d 58; Gilfillan’s Permit, 291 Pa. 358, 140 A. 136.
We have examined the record and find no manifest abuse of discretion or error of law. The order of the Court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Lois Mary McBride, which is reported in 8 D. & C. 2d 539. Appellant to pay the costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 Pa. 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-c-schneider-inc-v-zoning-board-of-adjustment-pa-1957.