Dylan Nathan Hagerman v. the State of Texas
This text of Dylan Nathan Hagerman v. the State of Texas (Dylan Nathan Hagerman v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-21-00012-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
DYLAN NATHAN HAGERMAN, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the County Court at Law of Comal County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
Before the Court is appellant's pro se motion for access to the appellate record.
On August 26, 2021, appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been
unable to examine the record in order to file a pro se brief.
Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion and it is hereby ORDERED that the
trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the date this order issues. It is FURTHER ORDERED
the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made
available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Furthermore, Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate
record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall
have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 27th day of September, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dylan Nathan Hagerman v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dylan-nathan-hagerman-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.