Dyer v. Parrott

60 Cal. 551, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 504
California Supreme Court·Decided May 30, 1882·No. No. 6,998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Court:

The objection to the assessment in this case is purely technical. It is not claimed that the omission complained of affected, or could affect, any substantial right or interest of the defendant. The error is one which might have been easily remedied by an appeal to the Board of Supervisors. But no appeal was taken to that Board. If an appeal had been taken and determined, the determination would be final and conclusive upon all parties entitled to appeal. (Stat. 1871-72, p. 815, § 12.)

We think that by neglecting to appeal the defendant waived the objection which he now raises to the assessment, and that the judgment and order of the Court below should be reversed.

Judgment and order denying a new trial reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dyer v. Parrott, 60 Cal. 551, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 504 (Cal. 1882).

60 Cal. 551 (Dyer v. Parrott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Construction Co. v. Newhouse
199 P. 519 (California Supreme Court, 1921)
Girvin v. Simon
48 P. 720 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Jennings v. Le Breton
21 P. 1127 (California Supreme Court, 1889)