Dyckman v. Dyckman
64 A.3d 627, 619 Pa. 397, 2013 WL 1240814, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 545
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(lp Does the Superior Court decision markedly conflict with the plain wording of section 3105(c) of the divorce code, 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 3105(c)?
(1) Does the Superior Court decision markedly conflict with a series of other decisions of the Superior Court, including Sorace v. Sorace, [628] 440 Pa.Super. 75, 655 A.2d 125 (1995); Gaster v. Gaster, 703 A.2d 513 (Pa.Super.1997); McMahon v. McMahon, 417 Pa.Super. 592, 612 A.2d 1360 (1992) (en banc); Peck v. Peck, 707 A.2d 1163 (Pa.Super.1998) and Miller v. Miller, 2009 PA Super 197, 983 A.2d 736 (2009)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dyckman v. Dyckman, 64 A.3d 627, 619 Pa. 397, 2013 WL 1240814, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 545 (Pa. 2013).
64 A.3d 627 (Dyckman v. Dyckman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sorace v. Sorace
655 A.2d 125 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Peck v. Peck
707 A.2d 1163 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
McMahon v. McMahon
612 A.2d 1360 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Miller v. Miller
983 A.2d 736 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Gaster v. Gaster
703 A.2d 513 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)