Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Paula Rickels
This text of Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Paula Rickels (Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Paula Rickels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
DYCK-O’NEAL, INC., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D17-0544
PAULA RICKELS,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed October 16, 2017.
An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County. James B. Fensom, Judge.
David M. Snyder, David M. Snyder Professional Association, Tampa, Susan B. Morrison of the Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., Tampa, and Joshua D. Moore of the Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 201 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for
deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a
deficiency judgment); see also Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 214 So. 3d 802 (Fla.
1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court’s decision in Higgins and
decisions by the other four district courts of appeal).
ROBERTS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Paula Rickels, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyck-oneal-inc-v-paula-rickels-fladistctapp-2017.