Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham

214 So. 3d 802, 2017 WL 1437374, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5651

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 2017

DocketCASE NO. 1D16-1624

StatusPublished

Cited by39 cases

This text of 214 So. 3d 802 (Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 214 So. 3d 802, 2017 WL 1437374, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5651 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider Appellant’s independent action at law for a deficiency decree in this post-foreclosure proceeding, the order on appeal is void, and hereby quashed. See Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 201 So.3d 157, 166-67 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment). In so ruling, we certify conflict with Garcia v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 178 So.3d 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Hendrick, 200 So.3d 181 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Gdovin v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 198 So.3d 986 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016); Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. McKenna, 198 So.3d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider Appellant’s independent action at law for a deficiency decree in this post-foreclosure proceeding, the order on appeal is void, and hereby quashed. See Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 201 So.3d 157, 166-67 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment). In so ruling, we certify conflict with Garcia v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 178 So.3d 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Hendrick, 200 So.3d 181 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Gdovin v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 198 So.3d 986 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016); Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. McKenna, 198 So.3d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 So. 3d 802, 2017 WL 1437374, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyck-oneal-inc-v-lanham-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack