Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lytle
227 So. 3d 764, 2017 WL 4582741
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 201 So.3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment); see also Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 214 So.3d 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court’s decision in Higgins and decisions by the other four district courts of appeal).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lytle, 227 So. 3d 764, 2017 WL 4582741 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
227 So. 3d 764 (Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lytle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sylvia Higgins and Collier Higgins v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc.
201 So. 3d 157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham
214 So. 3d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)