Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lytle

227 So. 3d 764, 2017 WL 4582741
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D17-1288·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 201 So.3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment); see also Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 214 So.3d 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court’s decision in Higgins and decisions by the other four district courts of appeal).

ROBERTS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lytle, 227 So. 3d 764, 2017 WL 4582741 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

227 So. 3d 764 (Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lytle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sylvia Higgins and Collier Higgins v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc.
201 So. 3d 157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham
214 So. 3d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)