Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Claribell Okoli

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Claribell Okoli

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 4, 2017

Docket16-5710

StatusPublished

This text of Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Claribell Okoli (Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Claribell Okoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Claribell Okoli, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

DYCK-O’NEAL, INC., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-5710

CLARIBELL OKOLI,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

David M. Snyder of David M. Snyder Professional Association, Tampa; Susan B. Morrison of Law Offices of Susan B. Morris, P.A. Tampa; Joshua D. Moore of Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.

Tracy J. S. Frasier of Smith Frasier, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 201 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 1st

DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for

deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a

deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a

deficiency judgment); see also Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 214 So. 3d 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court’s decision in Higgins and

decisions by the other four district courts of appeal).

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI