Dwyer v. Shalek

232 A.D. 780
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Orders reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. Service upon the defendant was not in conformity with the provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, which provides that notice of service upon [781] the Secretary of State and a copy of the summons therewith be sent by registered mail by plaintiff to the defendant, and that the defendant’s return receipt, the plaintiff’s affidavit of compliance and a copy of the summons and complaint be filed with the clerk of the court, since no such receipt was signed by the defendant and, therefore, not returned. (Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U. S. 352.) The papers were refused by the defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dwyer v. Shalek, 232 A.D. 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

232 A.D. 780 (Dwyer v. Shalek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Free Cab Corp. v. Fort
94 Misc. 2d 351 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1978)
Tomkiw v. Sauceda
132 N.W.2d 125 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1965)
Kohler v. Derderian
187 F. Supp. 173 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Bernardt v. Scianimanico
21 Misc. 2d 182 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Hendershot v. Ferkel
57 N.E.2d 819 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1943)
Spearman v. Stover
170 So. 259 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)
Ashbrook v. Otto
22 Ohio Law. Abs. 271 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1935)
Wagner v. Scurlock
170 A. 539 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1934)