Duymayan v. Valley Hospital Medical Center

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MERT DUYMAYAN, Case No.: 2:25-cv-00221-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case for 5} v. Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, [ECF No. 3] 7 Defendant 8 On March 21, 2025, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Mert Duymayan’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 3. Duymayan did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 1128 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 15}| otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 3) is accepted and plaintiff Mert Duymayan’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 9th day of April, 2025. 20 OIE a ANDREWP.GORDON. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE