Home/The Superior Court of New York City/Dusenbury v. Hoyt

Dusenbury v. Hoyt

14 Abb. Pr. 132
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided April 15, 1873·Published

Opinion

By the Court.—Barbour, Ch. J.

The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the able opinion pronounced by Judge Freedmah upon denying the motion for a new trial. The action should have been brought upon the new [138]*138promise, and cannot be maintained upon the note, which was annihilated as an obligation by the discharge in bankruptcy.

Howell and Yaw Yobst, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dusenbury v. Hoyt, 14 Abb. Pr. 132 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

14 Abb. Pr. 132 (Dusenbury v. Hoyt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.