Dusenbury v. Hoyt

The Superior Court of New York City

Dusenbury v. Hoyt

14 Abb. Pr. 132

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedApril 15, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Abb. Pr. 132 (Dusenbury v. Hoyt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dusenbury v. Hoyt, 14 Abb. Pr. 132 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.—Barbour, Ch. J.

The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the able opinion pronounced by Judge Freedmah upon denying the motion for a new trial. The action should have been brought upon the new [138]*138promise, and cannot be maintained upon the note, which was annihilated as an obligation by the discharge in bankruptcy.

Howell and Yaw Yobst, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.—Barbour, Ch. J.

The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the able opinion pronounced by Judge Freedmah upon denying the motion for a new trial. The action should have been brought upon the new [138]*138promise, and cannot be maintained upon the note, which was annihilated as an obligation by the discharge in bankruptcy.

Howell and Yaw Yobst, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Abb. Pr. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dusenbury-v-hoyt-nysuperctnyc-1873.