Durney v. Diguglielmo
92 A. 850, 28 Del. 289, 5 Boyce 289, 1914 Del. LEXIS 45
Opinion
delivering the opinion of the court:
The mechanics’ lien statute (Chapter 145, Section 1, Paragraph sixth, Volume 16, Laws of Delaware, Revised Code 1893, p. 820) provides:
“In every case in which one claim for work and labor or materials shall be filed by the same person or persons against two or more buildings, houses ■or structures owned by the same person or persons, for building, altering or repairing two or more buildings or structures owned by the same person or persons, the claimant shall, at the time of filing such joint claim, designate the amount which he claims to be due to him on each of such buildings, houses or structures.”
The statement filed in this case discloses that the claim is for work, etc., on two buildings owned by the same person, and" it does not conform to the requirement of the statute, in that it does not designate the amount claimed to be. due on each of said buildings. ...
The .exception is sustained. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durney v. Diguglielmo, 92 A. 850, 28 Del. 289, 5 Boyce 289, 1914 Del. LEXIS 45 (Del. Ct. App. 1914).
92 A. 850 (Durney v. Diguglielmo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Purported Last Will & Testament of Langmeier
466 A.2d 386 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1983)
Warner Co. v. Leedom Construction Co.
97 A.2d 884 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1953)
Warner Co. v. Leedom Construction Co.
93 A.2d 316 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1952)
E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. Continental-Diamond Fibre Co.
175 A. 266 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1934)
Newark Lumber Co. v. Continental Diamond Fibre Co.
157 A. 729 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1931)