Durkin v. Board of Fire Commissioners
101 A. 1053, 90 N.J.L. 670, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 386
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Durkin v. Board of Fire Commissioners. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 N.J.L. 468 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheiher, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durkin v. Board of Fire Commissioners, 101 A. 1053, 90 N.J.L. 670, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 386 (N.J. 1917).
101 A. 1053 (Durkin v. Board of Fire Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.