Durham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Durham v. State

183 So. 2d 588, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5562

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 1966

DocketNo. G-527

StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 2d 588 (Durham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durham v. State, 183 So. 2d 588, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5562 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Washington v. State, (1907) 51 Tex.Cr.R. 542, 103 S.W. 879; State v. Axelson, (1950) 37 Wash.2d 393, 223 P.2d 1059.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Washington v. State, (1907) 51 Tex.Cr.R. 542, 103 S.W. 879; State v. Axelson, (1950) 37 Wash.2d 393, 223 P.2d 1059.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 So. 2d 588, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-state-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack