Durham v. State
183 So. 2d 588, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5562
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Washington v. State, (1907) 51 Tex.Cr.R. 542, 103 S.W. 879; State v. Axelson, (1950) 37 Wash.2d 393, 223 P.2d 1059.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durham v. State, 183 So. 2d 588, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5562 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).
183 So. 2d 588 (Durham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Axelson
223 P.2d 1059 (Washington Supreme Court, 1950)
Washington v. State
103 S.W. 879 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1907)