Durgan, Nakeesha

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 7, 2007
DocketPD-1069-06
StatusPublished

This text of Durgan, Nakeesha (Durgan, Nakeesha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durgan, Nakeesha, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-1069-06
NAKEESHA DURGAN, Appellant


v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

ANGELINA COUNTY

Keller, P.J., filed a concurring opinion.

I continue to adhere to my position in Hogans v. State that the appealability of a matter under the deferred adjudication statute depends entirely upon the relief sought. (1) To the extent appellant's "competency to stand trial" claim challenges the trial court's ability to determine his punishment, the claim is appealable.



Filed: November 7, 2007

Publish

1. 176 S.W.3d 829, 837-41 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(Keller, P.J., dissenting).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hogans v. State
176 S.W.3d 829 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Durgan, Nakeesha, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durgan-nakeesha-texcrimapp-2007.