Durgan, Nakeesha

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 7, 2007·No. PD-1069-06·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-1069-06
NAKEESHA DURGAN, Appellant


v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

ANGELINA COUNTY

Keller, P.J., filed a concurring opinion.

I continue to adhere to my position in Hogans v. State that the appealability of a matter under the deferred adjudication statute depends entirely upon the relief sought. (1) To the extent appellant's "competency to stand trial" claim challenges the trial court's ability to determine his punishment, the claim is appealable.



Filed: November 7, 2007

Publish

1. 176 S.W.3d 829, 837-41 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(Keller, P.J., dissenting).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durgan, Nakeesha, (Tex. 2007).

Durgan, Nakeesha (Durgan, Nakeesha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hogans v. State
176 S.W.3d 829 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)