Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/Durant v. Durant

Durant v. Durant

14 S.E. 391, 35 S.C. 604, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Durant v. Durant. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 S.C. 49 →
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 12, 1892·No. No. 2831·Published

Opinion

This was a motion by respondent to recommit a “Case” to the Circuit Court to have inserted a statement that a certain deed was record[605]*605ed. The motion was refused per curiam, January 12, 1892, as it was not made to appear to this court that there was any evidence offered in the court below of the record of such deed, and appellant denied that there was any evidence of such fact.

A. B. Stuckey, for the motion. II. F. Wilson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durant v. Durant, 14 S.E. 391, 35 S.C. 604, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 138 (S.C. 1892).

14 S.E. 391 (Durant v. Durant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.