Durant v. Durant

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Durant v. Durant

14 S.E. 391, 35 S.C. 604, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 138

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 12, 1892

DocketNo. 2831

StatusPublished

This text of 14 S.E. 391 (Durant v. Durant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durant v. Durant, 14 S.E. 391, 35 S.C. 604, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 138 (S.C. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

This was a motion by respondent to recommit a “Case” to the Circuit Court to have inserted a statement that a certain deed was record[605]*605ed. The motion was refused per curiam, January 12, 1892, as it was not made to appear to this court that there was any evidence offered in the court below of the record of such deed, and appellant denied that there was any evidence of such fact.

A. B. Stuckey, for the motion. II. F. Wilson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was a motion by respondent to recommit a “Case” to the Circuit Court to have inserted a statement that a certain deed was record[605]*605ed. The motion was refused per curiam, January 12, 1892, as it was not made to appear to this court that there was any evidence offered in the court below of the record of such deed, and appellant denied that there was any evidence of such fact.

A. B. Stuckey, for the motion. II. F. Wilson, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 S.E. 391, 35 S.C. 604, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durant-v-durant-sc-1892.